Facebook? +FriendIan Guy for Dyson Award
by Spacewood on Jul.20, 2010, under Glasgow, Product Design
Ian Guy, a recent Product Design Engineering graduate, from the Glasgow School of Art, is running in this years James Dyson Award – a competition which champions innovative design engineering geared at solving real human problems. Ian, 20 years old, has spent the past year working with leading anaesthetists at Glasgow’s RHSC Yorkhill to tackle the problem of Air Entrainment in Intravenous Drip Lines.
As complicated as this sounds, Ian explains that “Air Entrainment is simply the problem of air bubbles forming in the infusion line. These bubbles cause a variety of problems, mainly staff distraction which consequently lowers patient safety – you don’t want to be wasting time removing air bubbles if a patient falls into a critical condition in theatre. At the extreme end of the spectrum these bubbles can result in fatality via air embolism – this is when a bubble passes into a patient’s bloodstream and stops blood flow. The solution seems initially surprisingly low-tech, however for me a true solution not only needs to solve the problem, but also be easily manufactured, implemented within an already over-complicated medical environment and also compete with existing less safe products price points, so for these reasons after exhaustive enquiries into more ‘sexed up ideas’ a simple modification to the existing drip chamber was the most viable option, both with respect to the engineering challenge, clinicians opinions and commercial viability.” Ian’s design includes the addition of a small floating seal which prevents “air entrainments from rigid fluid containers running dry – the most dangerous mechanism of entrainment due to the large volume of the air entrained, and the time consuming removal method.”
Ian’s simple redesign of the intravenous drip, could bring many benefits to hospital wards.
This year Ian has already placed 2nd in the University of Glasgow’s Big Idea Award, and won the Science, Engineering & Tech Category in the Scottish Institute for Enterprise’s New Ideas Competition securing funds to patent the device.
“Winning the Dyson Award would provide me with funds to secure the patent internationally and publicity to get under the radar of larger medical manufacturers who have the power and funds to take this project further.”
You can view Ian’s project, see the prototype in action and vote for Ian, by going to the James Dyson Award website.
Product Design Engineering is an undergraduate degree program and more information on the course and this years graduating students work can be found on the course microsite.
2 Comments for this entry
1 Trackback or Pingback for this entry
-
Ian Guy for Dyson Award - Final 20 | We Can Never Stop
August 28th, 2010 on 12:04[...] month, we brought you news that, Glasgow School of Art graduate, Ian Guy had been nominated for his redesign of the intravenous valve system. Ian’s design is deservedly raising a few eyebrows and out of 500 candidates, made it through [...]
December 14th, 2010 on 04:51
I’ve been follow up about ‘Air Free’ for Infusion Set since B.Braun already produce Intrafix SafeSet and there is a study of the flow-stop effect in an infusion set http://www.ifd.mavt.ethz.ch/education/student_projects/SEFAR_infusion_set
Your design is missing the filter component which is required according to the ISO 8536-4 and FDA.
January 10th, 2011 on 12:12
Azrin,
you are correct. according to ISO 8536-4 apparatus for intravenous infusion does require a particulate filter. The filter component exists in this design, however is not responsible for prevention of air entrainment merely the filtration of any solid matter. Note the graphics here are for understanding by a largely non technical audience hence omission of many design details. Use of a flexible seal as opposed to a filter mesh to prevent air entrainment has numerous advantages over a fine filter in clinical practice. It is not fluid dependant (Intrafix safeset can only be used to infuse crystalloid solutions, fine pore size means it would filter out components of blood products or some colloids such as gelofusine, hence room for potentially dangerous human error). The floating seal also provides visual feedback as to infusion state. I am happy to discuss this more pros and cons. you can leave your email here should you wish to discuss.
best
ian